Amy Buechler and Michael Seibel on founder coaching and having hard conversations · Y Combinator
A public conversation on founder coaching and on having difficult conversations earlier. Use it as a prompt to name the conversation, not as a script.
Topic map / People
9 questions
Y Combinator’s public conversation with Amy Buechler and Michael Seibel is about founder coaching and hard conversations. The useful move is to name the conversation before it becomes a file of unsent mail.
1.What conversation are you postponing with someone who depends on you?
Pass 2 · strengthened
Rehearse the facts and the decision you need. Saying the hard thing is not a licence to coerce.
2.What decision are you holding that another person could make?
3.What did you say you would do, and then not do?
4.How does bad news travel in this company?
5.What behaviour would you refuse from a cofounder if you saw it clearly?
6.Who disagrees with the plan, and when did you last ask them properly?
7.Which meeting exists because you are anxious, not because a decision is due?
8.What would a fair person say you owe the team this month?
Pass 2 · strengthened
Look at what the target rewards, including a number someone could game, or harm passed to a customer or a colleague.
9.Which targets could reward gaming, concealment, or passing harm to someone else, and which counter-checks do you need?
Pass 2 · new
Ask what the target causes people to ignore. Do not drop the goal because a paper has a sharp title.
Amy Buechler and Michael Seibel on founder coaching and having hard conversations · Y Combinator
A public conversation on founder coaching and on having difficult conversations earlier. Use it as a prompt to name the conversation, not as a script.
Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting · Academy of Management Perspectives, Ordóñez, Schweitzer, Galinsky and Bazerman
Volume 23, issue 1, pages 6 to 16. The journal page blocked an automated check. A University of Arizona record matched the authors, the title, the journal, and the DOI. This site does not list side effects beyond the title, because the paper itself was not open.
Ethical fading · Ethics Unwrapped, University of Texas at Austin
An educational explainer. Ethical fading is being so focused on other aspects of a decision that the ethical dimensions fade from view. The narration attributes the name to Ann Tenbrunsel and David Messick. It is not a UAE rule.